Legal Opinion

High v. Pearce

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1941PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

In the instant case, it does not appear that the experience of the widow with the law was a happy one.' Entitled to a dower of one-third in value of around eighty-five acres of land, partly in Wilson and partly in Johnston counties, she was allotted five acres out of the Wilson County tract of thirty-three acres, which tract was sufficient in value under the appraisal of the Land Bank to justify a loan of about $4,500. In addition to this mortgage there was an additional mortgage to the Bank of Lucarna of $250, under which this tract of land was sold by S. E. High, Sr., who was cashier of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Clark v. . HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Fowler v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Springer v. . ShavenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Deans v. DeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. In re J.T. (I)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API