Mastick v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in an eminent domain proceeding. The record shows that prior to 1966 the subject property was part of a larger parcel which was bisected north to south by Highway U.S. 89. In 1966 in connection with the construction of Interstate Highway 1-19, a controlled *368access highway, a condemnation action was filed by the State. At the trial of that action one of the property owners, Simon Mastick, testified that as a result of the construction of 1-19 the subject property in the before situation was worth $4,000 per acre, but was worth only $400 per…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Southern Electric Generating Co. v. LeibacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY, ETC. v. CannonArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Patch v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Holtz v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. HingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. FillerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- TCC ENTERPRISES v. Estate of ErnyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Board of County Commissioners v. FerrebeeUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Selective Resources v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.