Legal Opinion
Selective Resources v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 25, 1984No. 2 CA-SA 0105PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Chief Judge.
This case presents an issue of public importance pertaining to the scope of relevant evidence in eminent domain proceedings for which we have no precedent in this state. For this reason, and because petitioners have no equally plain, speedy, and adequate remedy by appeal, we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.
The petitioners in this special action are the owners of real property located in Pinal County which is the subject of condemnation proceedings initiated by respondent Arizona Public Service Company (APS) to obtain an easement for the construction and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Herman v. SchafferArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Defnet Land & Investment Co. v. State Ex Rel. HermanArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Herman v. Tucson Title InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Herman v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Viliborghi v. Prescott School District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Nucor Corp. v. Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- City of Phoenix v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. JenningsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986