Legal Opinion

FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Hing

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 9, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 7171PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

This appeal arises in an action to condemn property in order to construct an interceptor channel as part of the Lower Indian Bend Wash Flood Control Project. The defendants challenge the valuation date, the condemnation award, and the trial court’s refusal to award attorney’s fees and expert witness fees. We are also presented with the constitutionality of A.R.S. § 12-1127(B) (1982) which mandates that payment to a condemnee of funds paid into court by the condemnor based upon a judgment constitutes an abandonment of all defenses except the condemnee’s claim for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Bodcaw Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Morton Grove Park District v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. CaoiliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. Morrison v. Shanwick International Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Life Investors Insurance Co. of America v. Horizon Resources Bethany, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Pima County v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API