FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Hing
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
This appeal arises in an action to condemn property in order to construct an interceptor channel as part of the Lower Indian Bend Wash Flood Control Project. The defendants challenge the valuation date, the condemnation award, and the trial court’s refusal to award attorney’s fees and expert witness fees. We are also presented with the constitutionality of A.R.S. § 12-1127(B) (1982) which mandates that payment to a condemnee of funds paid into court by the condemnor based upon a judgment constitutes an abandonment of all defenses except the condemnee’s claim for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Bodcaw Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morton Grove Park District v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. CaoiliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Morrison v. Shanwick International Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Life Investors Insurance Co. of America v. Horizon Resources Bethany, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Pima County v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.