Legal Opinion

State v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1978No. 7818SC58PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

This case presents the sole question of whether a portion of G.S. 14-186 is, as the Superior Court judge found, too vague and indefinite to comport with the due process requirements of Article I, Section 19 of the North Carolina Constitution and of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In pertinent part, G.S. 14-186 reads:

“Opposite Sexes occupying same bedroom at hotel for immoral purposes .... Any man and woman found occupying the same bedroom in any hotel, public inn or boardinghouse for any immoral purpose . . . shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. . LuedersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. FurioSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. MelloCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. MetzgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. JeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. JeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API