Legal Opinion
State v. Jean
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 2, 1984No. 112A83Published
1Opinion of the Court
311 S.E.2d 266 (1984)
310 N.C. 157
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Lesly JEAN.
No. 112A83.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
February 2, 1984.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. M. Ann Reed, Raleigh, for the State.
Marc D. Towler, Asst. Appellate Defender, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.
MEYER, Justice.
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the identification testimony of Mrs. Wilson, arguing that the testimony was the product of a pretrial identification procedure which was so impermissibly suggestive that it created a substantial…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.