Legal Opinion

State v. Furio

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1966No. 664PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

It will be noted that in each case the affidavit upon which the warrant was issued, and which is made a part of the warrant by reference, charges the defendant with maintaining a motion picture screen “within the City Limits of High Point, or within one mile of said City Limits, or within High Point, Deep River, or Jamestown Township,” in violation of the ordinance of the city of High Point. [Emphasis added.]

An incorporated city or town is an agency created by the State. It has no governmental power or authority except such as has been granted to it by the Legislature, expressly or by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. LowrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Holmes v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. State v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. . LangstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Town of Emerald Isle Ex Rel. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. McBaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Horton v. GulledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API