Legal Opinion
Hysell v. Murray
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided October 20, 1961No. Civ. No. 1-156PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is now before the court on motion of the defendant Paul Murray to dismiss the complaint and to quash the purported service of process. The complaint filed herein alleges that the plaintiff is a citizen of Mobile, Alabama, and the defendant is a citizen of Ottumwa, Iowa. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident in France.
The return of service of summons filed herein reads as follows:
“I hereby certify and return, that on the 21st day of February, 1961, I received this summons and served it *586together with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rovinski v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- McFadden v. ShoreDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Ruth & Clark, Inc. v. EmerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Berner v. FarnyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
- James v. Russell F. Davis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1958
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stephen Borzeka v. Margaret O. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co. v. TurnerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1970
- French v. AngelicCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Hron v. RyanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Desalvo v. Clarity Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025