Legal Opinion
Berner v. Farny
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 25, 1951No. C 49-49PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, Chief Judge.
This is a motion to vacate service of the summons and complaint upon the defendant Eugene R. Farny on the ground that no jurisdiction was obtained over the person of this defendant because said service of process was not in conformity with Rule 4(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
*507The return of the deputy marshal upon the summons certified that a copy of the summons and complaint herein was served upon the defendant Farny on January 18, 1949 by “delivering to and leaving with Cyril Farny, Brother of said Eugene R. Farny, a Copy thereof, at his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- La Tourette v. McMasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Rovinski v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Townsend v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Jeffcott v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bill Ransom v. Frances Hugh Brennan, of the Estate of William J. Brennan,deceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Hurst v. Southwest Miss. Legal Services Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Shore v. Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1963
- Di Leo v. Shin ShuDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Franklin America, Inc. v. Franklin Cast Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.