Legal Opinion

Ruth & Clark, Inc. v. Emery

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1943No. 46314PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

Plaintiff’s petition seeks foreclosure of mechanic’s liens and a personal judgment in the sum of $695 against the defendant Fitz. The sheriff’s return recited that the original notice was served upon Fitz on October 22, 1942, by leaving a copy thereof with his wife at “his usual place of residence * * * said Robert Fitz not found in' Polk County, Iowa, after diligent search.” Fitz filed a special appearance which asserted that the notice was left with his wife at her usual place of residence, which had not been his usual place of residence since June 26, 1942, when he was inducted into the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kline v. KlineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Hinds v. HindsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  3. State v. GroomeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  4. Vanderpœl v. O'HanlonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Love v. CherrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thoenes v. TatroOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. McFadden v. ShoreDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Kollman v. McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  4. Cowles Communications, Inc. v. Board of Review of Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Allder v. HudsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API