Hamilton v. Ferguson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The complaint filed by plaintiffs in this suit contains three causes of action. By the first cause of action plaintiffs sought to quiet their title to certain land against claims thereto of the defendants Roy N. and Grace M. Ferguson, which were alleged to be without right. By the second cause of action plaintiffs sought to obtain a decree canceling a lease agreement covering the same real property described in the first cause of action in which agreement plaintiffs were lessors and the defendant Grace M. Ferguson was lessee. By the third cause of action plaintiffs sought declaratory relief…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Van Derhoof v. ChambonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hironymous v. HiattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- In Re McNameeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Pennell v. Stanley W. Smith, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Los Angeles & Salt Lake R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946