Legal Opinion

In Re McNamee

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1933No. Docket No. 1004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the fifteenth day of May, 1929, respondent, as petitioner, filed an application to register, under the Land Title Law, his land described as "Lot `A' of Tract No. 10573, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in book 159, page 10 of maps, in the office of the recorder of said county, constituting one parcel of land." The petition contains the usual averments in actions of this character. The appellants are named therein as adjoining property owners. And likewise the separate answers of these appellants contain the usual denials and averments in actions of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Thayer v. TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Phelps v. PeabodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Goodrich v. Mayor & Common Council of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  5. In Re ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sy First Family Ltd. Partnership v. CheungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Rice v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Hamilton v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Shreve & Co. v. McGinnisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API