Legal Opinion

United States v. McQueen

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 27, 1979No. 36,187; SPCM 13134PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

We granted review of the following contention:

THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING THE CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE AS TO CAPTAIN KASPER, COURT MEMBER.

Resolution is readily performed by using the rule laid down in United States v. Deain, 5 U.S.C.M.A. 44, 49, 17 C.M.R. 44, 49 (1954):

If the evidence touching the issue is in conflict, the balance must be struck by the person or persons having authority to rule on the challenge. There must be a clear abuse of discretion in resolving the conflict before an appellate tribunal, which lacks the power to reweigh the facts, will reverse a…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. KarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. BoydUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. RojasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. MatthewsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. McPhaulU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. MasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API