United States v. McQueen
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
We granted review of the following contention:
THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING THE CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE AS TO CAPTAIN KASPER, COURT MEMBER.
Resolution is readily performed by using the rule laid down in United States v. Deain, 5 U.S.C.M.A. 44, 49, 17 C.M.R. 44, 49 (1954):
If the evidence touching the issue is in conflict, the balance must be struck by the person or persons having authority to rule on the challenge. There must be a clear abuse of discretion in resolving the conflict before an appellate tribunal, which lacks the power to reweigh the facts, will reverse a…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. KarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. BoydUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
4Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. RojasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. MatthewsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. McPhaulU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. MasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.