United States v. Boyd
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Chief Judge:
The question granted by this Court is:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION BY DISALLOWING A CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE AGAINST A JURY MEMBER, STAFF SERGEANT HAYES, AND COMPELLED THE TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL TO USE HIS PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE.
Our examination of the voir dire examination of Sergeant Hayes leads us to find from this record1 that the trial judge did not improperly disallow a challenge for cause against the member.
This Court earlier laid down the rule for appellate review of this question in United States v. Deain, 5 U.S.C.M.A. 44, 49, 17…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. KarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. TippitUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. McQueenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. RojasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. GarriesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.