Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 1, 1951No. 33838PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.

The parties will be referred to by name or as they appeared in the court below.

Herman L. Hurst owned an oil and gas lease on the S/2 of the NW/4 of sec. 20, twp. 6 north, range 7 east, in Seminole county, Oklahoma, known as the Gaines Lease. He talked with the plaintiff, H. O. Brown, T. H. Burroughs, and W. F. Singley about getting an oil well drilled on this 80 acres. He told them he would give them a one-sixth interest each in the lease if they would get someone to put up $4,000 to drill the well, and that he would give that person a one-fourth interest. Brown and Singley prevailed upon W.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hatten v. Interocean Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Lyons v. StekollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Security State Bank of Comanche v. LockettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Elm Oil Co. v. Clark Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hurst v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. The Town of Antlers, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation v. Harold BensonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API