Legal Opinion
Lyons v. Stekoll
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 17, 1939No. 28748PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This appeal involves an action in the district court, wherein the defendant in error and the plaintiff in error herein appeared as the plaintiff and defendant, respectively.
The claim upon which the plaintiff sought and obtained recovery against the defendant was for expenses he was alleged to have incurred in connection with the operation of an oil and gas lease.
After hearing the evidence, the trial court found that the defendant was the owner of an undivided one-fourth interest in said oil and gas lease and that the plaintiff and defendant were mining partners in the premises.
The court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Duryea v. BurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- White v. A. C. Houston Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Barrett v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Kennedy v. Beets Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blocker Exploration Co. v. Frontier Exploration, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Great Western Oil & Gas Company v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- J. E. Crosbie, Inc. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Hurst v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Hurst v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.