Legal Opinion
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Sibley
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 13, 2016No. Case No. RWT 16-cv-1459PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROGER W. TITUS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Montgomery Blair Sibley (“Sibley”) is trained and was previously licensed as an attorney. He was suspended from the practice of law for three years in Florida (2008), three years in the District of Columbia (2010) and indefinitely in New York (2009).1 The suspensions were based on Sibley’s pursuit of meritless and vexatious litigation. He has not been reinstated by these jurisdictions.
In January 2011, Sibley obtained employment as a sales consultant for Car-Max. The relationship did not end well. CarMax terminated Sibley’s…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Aisha Bradley v. City of Philadelphia, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Anderson v. Credit One Bank, N.A.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Andrew v. Accenture Federal Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Chrishon-Skinner v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Fitch v. The St. Paul's School for GirlsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.