Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Simmons

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1914No. S.F. No. 6629PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. P. Andrews, and Pemberton & Pemberton, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

On the fifth day of February, 1912, two papers were admitted to probate as the last will of Phillip Simmons, deceased, and a codicil thereto. On the third day of October, 1912, Nellie L. Wertner, claiming to be an heir at law of the decedent, filed a contest and petition for revocation of probate. No application for the issuance of a citation was made, and no citation was ever issued.

On February 18, 1913, Permelia L. West, one of the residuary legatees named in the will, served upon the contestant a notice that she would move for a dismissal of the contest and petition for revocation on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Estate of RicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Maynard v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API