Mi A Lowe v. Mao Izakaya & Sushi LLC, and others
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MI A LOWE, Case No. 26-cv-00449-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 v. DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND 13 MAO IZAKAYA & SUSHI LLC, and others, Re: ECF 48 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Before the Court is Defendant Hana Escrow Company, Inc.’s (HEC) Motion to 18 Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. HEC argues Plaintiff Lowe cannot state a claim for breach 19 of fiduciary duty because HEC was unaware of Lowe’s potential claim against Defendant 20 Mao Izakaya & Sushi LLC. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- People v. BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Knoxville Outfitting Co. v. Knoxville, Fireproof Storage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.