Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Strickland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 9, 2009No. 07-689PublishedCited by 2,751 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Kennedy

This case requires us to interpret §2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965,79 Stat. 487, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1973 (2000 ed.). The question is whether the statute can be invoked to require state officials to draw election-district lines to allow a racial minority to join with other voters to elect the minority’s candidate of choice, even where the racial minority is less than 50 percent of the voting-age population in the district to be drawn. To use election-law terminology: In a district that is not a majority-minority district, if a racial minority could elect its candidate of choice with…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,751 opinions

  1. Lynch v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  2. Öztürk v. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
  3. Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Cooper v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Marc Veasey v. Greg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

2,746 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API