Goodwin v. Heckler
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 245, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1914, No.. 2862, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of John A. Goodwin v. Chas. J. Heckler. Assumpsit for a balance due on a contract for the sale of brick. Before McMichael, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $5,461.82 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were answers to points.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Mestrezat,
The only question in the case, as suggested by the ap*333pellant, is whether there was an obligation on the part of the defendant to make a tender of the six houses in order to bar the plaintiff’s money claim, or conversely, whether the plaintiff was required as a matter of law to demand conveyance of the six houses before he was entitled to recover money damages in lieu of the property.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, a brick manufacturer, against the defendant, a builder, to recover a balance of $5,014.75 due on a contract for the sale and delivery of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. KiffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Santee v. SanteeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Grunwald v. HahnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Stewart v. MorrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
- Phillips v. Allegheny Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pantano v. Zamer Motor Sales Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Gloekler v. PainterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Cohen v. Bank of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Dodson Coal Co. v. New Boston Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Luck v. McNeilSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.