Stewart v. Morrow
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the District Court of Allegheny county. The plaintiffs in error were defendants below. This was an action brought by Morrow, assignee of Absalom Morris, under a voluntary assignment, for the benefit of creditors on sundry promissory notes of the same tenor, except as to date and amount, a copy of one of which is given in the opinion of the court below.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court of Allegheny county. The plaintiffs in error were defendants below. This was an action brought by Morrow, assignee of Absalom Morris, under a voluntary assignment, for the benefit of creditors on sundry promissory notes of the same tenor, except as to date and amount, a copy of one of which is given in the opinion of the court below. The defendants admitted the signatures to the notes to be genuine, and that the same were given for an adequate consideration. The notes on which the action was brought, had passed from the hands of the payee before they fell due, and…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion was delivered
2Per curiam
— We think that the law of this case is so fully *207expressed in tbe opinion of tbe learned judge of tbe District Court,' and the principles are so completely justified, that it is not necessary for us to do more than to express our concurrence in them. We do not see anything in the case to take it out of the general rule.
Judgment affirmed.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goodwin v. HecklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Santee v. SanteeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Dodson Coal Co. v. New Boston Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923