Legal Opinion
Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided September 29, 1998No. 96-062LPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAGUEUX, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs (“Ross-Simons”) seek damages for alleged breach of contract and related claims arising out of a 1992 agreement. Two motions by defendant (“Baccarat”) are now before the Court: a motion for summary judgment as to all counts of plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint and a motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, to strike plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages and Count VI of the Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied, defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages is…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Kolling v. American Power Conversion Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Lazy Oil, Co. v. Witco Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. Watts Regulator Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.