Legal Opinion

Dawson County Irrigation Co. v. McMullen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1930No. 27264PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action to enjoin the state officials comprising the department of public works from conducting a hearing-, pursuant to the provisions of section 8428, Comp. St. 1922, for the purpose of determining whether plaintiff’s water appropriations for irrigation purposes should be declared forfeited and annulled because of abandonment or non-use. To the amended petition general demurrers were sustained. Plaintiff elected to plead no further. Judgment of dismissal was entered, from which plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff bases its right to injunctive relief on the ground that said section 8428, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford Co. v. HathawayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Farmers Canal Co. v. FrankNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Tri-State Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Kersenbrock v. BoyesNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Reed v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. TiemannNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. School District of Seward Education Ass'n v. School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Nebraska Mid-State Reclamation District v. Hall CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Howard v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Leeman v. VocelkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API