Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Tiemann

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1967No. 36810PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

The plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment holding L.B. 377, sections 14 through 137, enacted by the 1967 Legislature, unconstitutional and totally void insofar as it relates to the, state income tax, and enjoining the defendants frdm enforcement. Plaintiffs include domestic corporations and both resident and nonresident individuals. Defendants are various officials of the State of Nebraska. Issues were, joined on a demurrer, stipulation of facts, and a later motion for summary judgment. The district court held that sections 14 to 137, L.B. 377, were valid in all respects, with one exception…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Travis v. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Lincoln Dairy Company v. FiniganNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Salorio v. GlaserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. School District of Seward Education Ass'n v. School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API