Legal Opinion

Farmers Canal Co. v. Frank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1904No. 13,870PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Error to the district court for Scott’s Bluff county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Letton, C.

On the 14th day of April, 1902, William Frank, defendant in error herein, filed in the office of the secretary *137of the state board of irrigation, his application for an appropriation of 2200 cubic feet per second of time of the water of the North Platte river for irrigating and other beneficial purposes, proposing to construct a canal about 150 miles in length and to irrigate about 150,000 acres of land. The point of diversion of the water and the line of the proposed canal being substantially the same as that of a canal, the construction of which had been begun by the Farmers Canal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Farm Investment Co. v. CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Crawford Co. v. HathawayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  4. Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. New Mercer Ditch Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Board of Water Engineers v. McKnightTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Ormsby County v. KearneyNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Campbell v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Metropolitan Utilities District v. Merritt Beach Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Murphy v. KerrDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1923

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API