Legal Opinion

Leeman v. Vocelka

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1948No. 32332PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was found guilty of contempt by the district court for Douglas County, and “not as punishment, but as a token and demonstration that all people are amenable to the orders of the Court” defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of one dollar and costs, and to be confined momentarily in the custody of the sheriff and then be released, but upon failure to pay the fine and costs, he was ordered committed in lieu thereof. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court also castigated and reprimanded Edward F. Fogarty, the city attorney, for alleged…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Sheridan v. ColvinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Conrad v. KaupNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Griffin v. GassNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. K & L DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. MurkowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Nickel v. School Board of AxtellNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Concerned Citizens of Kimball County, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ControlNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API