Legal Opinion

City of North Pole v. Zabek

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1997No. S-6777, S-6907, S-6927PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The City of North Pole (City) terminated Betty Zabek’s employment as a police dispatcher without providing a hearing. Zabek appealed this termination to the City’s personnel review board (PRB), which heard oral argument some months after the termination. The PRB later affirmed Zabek’s termination.

Zabek appealed to the superior court. The superior court found that Zabek’s termination violated her right to due process of law, and that the appeal before the PRB did not provide sufficient process to serve as a curative post-termination hearing. It…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Case v. Shelby County Civil Service Merit BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  2. Dougan v. Aurora Electric Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Williams v. AboodAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Maness v. DailyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Bostic v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement DivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API