Legal Opinion
Faircloth v. Duke University
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided April 10, 2003No. 1:02 CV 00694PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OSTEEN, District Judge.
On February 19, 2003, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636.
Therefore, the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that defendant’s motion to dismiss (docket no. 5) is denied as to plaintiffs first two claims for relief and granted as to its third and fourth claims for relief.
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Robert J. Fox v. General Motors Corporation, and Robert Trumble, Bankruptcy Trustee, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Rhoads v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Inslaw, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gottesman v. J.H. Batten, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Gallimore v. Newman MacHine Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Doepke-Kline v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Creech v. City of Wilson, North CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019