Legal Opinion

Hale v. McLaughlin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 28, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff while a spectator in a moving picture theatre owned and operated by the defendant. The injury consisted of a fracture of a small piece of one of the bones of his leg. It was conceded at the trial that the theatre was operated for profit as a place of amusement to which the public were attracted by billboards; that the entertainment was a continuous performance of moving pictures from about 1:30 p.m. until about 10:30 p.m. and that during all this time the theatre was dimly lighted; that the same seats had been in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Lake Ontario Beach Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Thompson v. Lowell, Lawrence, & Haverhill Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Judson v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Blanchette v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Branch v. KlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Keenan v. E. M. Loew's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Couris v. Casco Amusement Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. Correira v. Atlantic Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Shanney v. Boston Madison Square Garden Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Rosston v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API