Legal Opinion

Rosston v. Sullivan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 29, 1931PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action of tort for personal injuries sustained in a theatre owned and operated by the defendant. The verdict was for the plaintiff. Exceptions were saved to the refusal by the trial judge to direct a verdict for the defendant and to give certain requests for rulings. The judge stated to the jury, without objection, that *33they could not find any defective construction of the theatre and that the negligence, if any, was in the failure to provide such light as a reasonable, prudent theatre owner, manager or operator would have provided in view of that construction.

The defendant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carleton v. Franconia Iron & Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Grogan v. O'Keeffe's Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Oakley v. RichardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  4. Currier v. Boston Music Hall Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Little v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Keenan v. E. M. Loew's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Brooks v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Rynn v. Fox-New England Theatres, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Upham v. Chateau De Ville Dinner Theatre, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API