Rosston v. Sullivan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
This is an action of tort for personal injuries sustained in a theatre owned and operated by the defendant. The verdict was for the plaintiff. Exceptions were saved to the refusal by the trial judge to direct a verdict for the defendant and to give certain requests for rulings. The judge stated to the jury, without objection, that *33they could not find any defective construction of the theatre and that the negligence, if any, was in the failure to provide such light as a reasonable, prudent theatre owner, manager or operator would have provided in view of that construction.
The defendant’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carleton v. Franconia Iron & Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Grogan v. O'Keeffe's Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Oakley v. RichardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Currier v. Boston Music Hall Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Little v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Keenan v. E. M. Loew's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Brooks v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Rynn v. Fox-New England Theatres, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Upham v. Chateau De Ville Dinner Theatre, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.