Legal Opinion
Cantrell v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 26, 1976No. CA 5079PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Employe appeals from a determination of the Employment Appeals Board that she voluntarily left work without good cause (ORS 657.176(2)(c)) and hence was not entitled to unemployment compensation. The administrator and the referee had held she had good cause, and had awarded compensation.
The Appeals Board heard the matter de novo on the record (Stevenson v. Morgan, 17 Or App 428, 522 P2d 1204 (1974)), and this court reviews its decision to determine whether it was based upon substantial evidence, which is "* * * 'such proof as a reasonable mind would employ to support a conclusion.’ * * *”…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stevenson v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Mosley v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Fajardo v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Szojka Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Welker Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Grigsby v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- De St. Germain v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Glennen v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Wright v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.