Fajardo v. Morgan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
Claimant quit her employment because she felt she was being discriminated against by reason of her sex. She appeals from a denial of her claim for unemployment compensation. The referee’s decision, upheld by the Employment Appeals Board, was based on disqualification of the claimant under ORS 657.176 (2), which states:
“An individual whose unemployment is due to: * *
“(2) Having left work voluntarily without good cause * * *
# * * ft
shall * * * be disqualified * * *.”
Decision in this case depends on the meaning of “without good canse.”
The essential facts are not in dispute. The claimant began…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- James v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Toland v. SchneiderIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- National Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
- Roby v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Industrial Commission v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Stevenson v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Rogue River Packing Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976
- Lewis & Clark College v. Bureau of LaborCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.