City of Minneapolis v. Village of Nerstrand
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment determining the settlement of a wife and minor child for poor relief purposes.
The controlling facts were stipulated. The conclusions of law are attacked by the assignments of error. The facts are these: The respondent city as well as the appellant village are under the town system as to poor relief. Prior to 1928, Mrs. Myrtle Luella Baal-son lived ivith her husband, Elvin Baalson, at Duluth, Minnesota. During that year she without cause willfully deserted him and *97never returned. She has not been divorced from him. Since 1932 her husband has continuously…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prater v. PraterTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Willmar v. Village of SpicerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Town of Mount Holly v. Town of PeruSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
- Inhabitants of Greece v. Inhabitants of WindhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1836
- In Re Settlement of GoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Settlement of BaalsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941