Legal Opinion

City of Minneapolis v. Village of Nerstrand

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1941No. 33,099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment determining the settlement of a wife and minor child for poor relief purposes.

The controlling facts were stipulated. The conclusions of law are attacked by the assignments of error. The facts are these: The respondent city as well as the appellant village are under the town system as to poor relief. Prior to 1928, Mrs. Myrtle Luella Baal-son lived ivith her husband, Elvin Baalson, at Duluth, Minnesota. During that year she without cause willfully deserted him and *97never returned. She has not been divorced from him. Since 1932 her husband has continuously…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Prater v. PraterTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  2. City of Willmar v. Village of SpicerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Town of Mount Holly v. Town of PeruSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  4. Inhabitants of Greece v. Inhabitants of WindhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1836
  5. In Re Settlement of GoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Settlement of BaalsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API