Wenneker v. Frager
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
The issue here is the trial court’s authority to render judgment enforcing a settlement after the parties had executed a memorandum agreement and stipulated in open court that the cause be “passed for settlement”. We affirm the judgment.
The background. Respondent Burt Wen-neker, a builder, and appellants Joseph and Gertrude Frager, property owners, sued each other over a construction contract. Wenneker sought a money judgment and a mechanic’s lien against the Fragers’ property, joining other potential lienholders as defendants. Joseph Frager sued Wenneker for damages,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Landau v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Fair Mercantile Co. v. Union-May-Stern Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- State Ex Rel. A. M. T. v. WeinsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Ethridge v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Austin & Bass Builders, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hyatt Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. of N.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Comet Casualty Co. v. SchneiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Barton v. SnellsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. RoussinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rosenblum v. Jacks or Better of America West Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.