Legal Opinion

Wenneker v. Frager

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1969No. 33393PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

The issue here is the trial court’s authority to render judgment enforcing a settlement after the parties had executed a memorandum agreement and stipulated in open court that the cause be “passed for settlement”. We affirm the judgment.

The background. Respondent Burt Wen-neker, a builder, and appellants Joseph and Gertrude Frager, property owners, sued each other over a construction contract. Wenneker sought a money judgment and a mechanic’s lien against the Fragers’ property, joining other potential lienholders as defendants. Joseph Frager sued Wenneker for damages,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Landau v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Fair Mercantile Co. v. Union-May-Stern Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. A. M. T. v. WeinsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Ethridge v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Austin & Bass Builders, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hyatt Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. of N.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Comet Casualty Co. v. SchneiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Barton v. SnellsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. RoussinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Rosenblum v. Jacks or Better of America West Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API