McNeil v. Wisconsin
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Stevens
The Court’s opinion demeans the importance of the right to counsel. As a practical matter, the opinion probably will have only a slight impact on current custodial interrogation procedures. As a theoretical matter, the Court’s innovative development of an “offense-specific” limitation on the scope of the attorney-client relationship can only generate confusion in the law and undermine the protections that undergird our adversarial system of justice. As a symbolic matter, today’s decision is ominous because it reflects a preference for an inquisitorial system that regards the defense lawyer as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.