Legal Opinion

Scopes v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1925PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiep Justice Green

delivered the opinion of the Oonrt.

The plaintiff in error has been convicted of a violation of chapter 27 of the Public Acts of 1925, known as the Anti-Evolution Act, and has appealed in error to this court. A motion has been made by the State to strike from the record the bill of exceptions on the ground that it was not seasonably filed.

Plaintiff in error was tried at a special term of the circuit court of Rhea county beginning on July 10, 1925. The minutes of the court, of date July 21,1925, show that a motion for a new trial was made and overruled on that day, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Dunn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Baker v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Harmon v. TylerTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Rodgers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Scopes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Coffman v. BomarDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1963
  3. Fletcher v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  4. Anderson v. SharpTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Mitchell v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API