Legal Opinion

United States v. Victor

United States Customs Court

Decided January 29, 1948No. 7522; Entry No. M-2758, etcPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

These petitions for review are in the nature of cross-appeals from the judgment of the trial court (18 Oust. Ct. 292, Reap. Dec. 6753) which held that the proper basis for appraising the imported merchandise covered by appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, was export value (section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930), established by the importer to be represented by the entered values.

The merchandise consists of hard candy and chocolate bars which were exported from Havana, Cuba. It was entered at the port of Miami, Fla., at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Monroe-Goldkamp Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. FuldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Wool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Florea & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  3. Graves v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Florea & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  5. Millmaster International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API