Legal Opinion

Rietmann-Pilcer Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 21, 1928No. 3023PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Babbeb, Judge,

delivered the opinion .of the court:

This appeal from the judgment of the third division of the United States Customs Court denying a petition for remission of additional duties under section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1922 involves certain entries made in November, 1925, which.were made in the name of appellants, and relates, it is said, to certain beaded bags.

When the petition was heard by the court below only one witness, Mr. Brach, testified. The substantial part of his relevant testimony, on direct examination, sometimes using his exact language, was as follows: That at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Monroe-Goldkamp Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montemayor e Hijos v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  2. Thornley v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. United States v. Swift & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API