Legal Opinion

Longbottom v. American Dredging Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1958No. 411 of 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EGAN, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on the libellant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to the filing of the libel in personam and the answer thereto.

The action proper involves a claim for maintenance and cure allegedly accruing to the benefit of the libellant since December 7, 1956 — the date- of a prior decree in his favor. (No. 465 of 1954, In Admiralty, E.D., Pa.)1

The motion is bottomed on the theory that the respondent has alleged no defense to this present claim in that all issues raised by the answer are res judicata by virtue of the “Findings of Fact and Conclusions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Infante v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Brady v. Waterman S. S. Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kalyvakis v. the TSS OlympiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. American President Lines, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
  3. Sea Trade Corp. v. Bethlehem Steel Co., Shipbuilding DivisionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API