Legal Opinion

Infante v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1950No. 115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

The libellant’s sole objection to the Order of Dismissal entered in this matter, D.C., 91 F.Supp. 71, appears to be that the Admiralty Rules do not provide for the entry of summary judgment and that the only cause for dismissal of a libel is that' set forth in Rule 38, 28 U.S.C.A. Libellant’s position may therefore be summed up as stating that the provisions of the Admiralty Rules limit the power of the court and that the power set forth in the rules is exclusive. With this, of course, I cannot agree. Courts in Admiralty traditionally have had the powers of the Civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Crescitelli v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Infante v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Theriot v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kalyvakis v. the TSS OlympiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. American President Lines, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
  3. Longbottom v. American Dredging Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Sea Trade Corp. v. Bethlehem Steel Co., Shipbuilding DivisionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API