Lee v. Hedenskoog
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Muskegon; Sullivan, 3. Bill by Charles H. H. Lee and another against Ernest Hedenskoog for an accounting ahd for other relief. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, j.
The plaintiffs are the children, and only heirs at law, of Kittie M. Lee, deceased, formerly of Muskegon, Michigan, and are the owners of her entire interest in the property of the firm called the *428“Occidental Club.” Mrs. Lee, in her lifetime, and the defendant were partners under the firm name and style of the Occidental Club, their business being the conducting of billiard rooms and bowling alleys in the city of Muskegon. The agreement under which they operated is as follows:
“Whereas, a contract has this day been entered into between Ernest Hedenskoog, as first party, and Kittie M.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wardell v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Old National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Laubengayer v. RohdeMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Mack v. Village of FrankfortMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Bay City Bridge Co. v. Van EttenMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- LeBaron Homes, Inc. v. Pontiac Housing Fund, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Koontz v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Bartos v. CzerwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Gannon v. StansfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Michigan Bean Co. v. Burrell Engineering & Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.