Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gannon v. Stansfield

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1921No. Docket No. 93PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from St. Clair; Law (Eugene F.), J. Bill by Joseph J. Gannon and another against Joshua Stansfield for the specific performance of a land contract. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Defendant Stansfield resides in Oregon. He owned a house and lot in St. Clair county, Michigan, for which he engaged C. D. Rose of Detroit to find a purchaser. Rose requested Omar D. Cope of St. Clair, a real estate broker, to aid him. Cope found purchasers, the plaintiffs. The following writing was made by plaintiffs and Cope:

“Purchasing Application.
“St. Clair, Mich., May 27, 1919.
“The undersigned hereby applies to Omar D. Cope & Co., agent for the purchase of the property herein described, situate in the township of St. Clair, St. Clair county, Mich., on the terms and conditions following,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee v. HedenskoogMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Thomas v. GreenwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. LeBaron Homes, Inc. v. Pontiac Housing Fund, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Johnston v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Olson v. SashMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Sharrar v. NestleMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API