Legal Opinion

State v. Noble

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1990No. 160PA89PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The first question posed by this appeal is whether the defendant has been afforded an appeal that comports with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh’g denied, 388 U.S. 924, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967). In Anders the defendant’s court appointed attorney advised the appellate court by letter that he felt there was no merit in the appeal and would not file a brief. He told the court his client would file a- brief on his own behalf. The client filed a brief. The appellate court found no error. The United States Supreme Court held this was not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. O'Bryan v. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. DeLeonardoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. LaPlancheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API