Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1991No. 904SC286PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant’s attorney has filed a brief with this Court in which he states: “The undersigned has reviewed said trial transcript and could find no basis for arguing any reversible errors.” He has brought forth two assignments of error, but has not argued them or cited any authority dealing with these points of law, stating he “could find no basis for arguing in support” of these assignments.

The first issue before us, then, is whether this appeal complies with the requirements of appellate advocacy in criminal cases as set out in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed.2d 493,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. O'Bryan v. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. KinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Pless v. STATE OF NC, COUNTY OF MECKLENBURGDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. In Re MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. DayberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. In Re MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API