State Bank v. Pangerl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
This is an action by the State Bank of Willow River against Paul Pangerl, Marie Pangerl, his wife, and E. C. Townsend upon a promissory note. There were findings and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant Townsend appeals. The defendants Pangerl did not answer and have no defense..
1. On October 7, 1912, the Pangerls made a note to the plaintiff bank for $1,178.60 due in six months. On March 27, 1913, the Pangerls made to Townsend a note for $352. This note was indorsed by Townsend and is the one in suit. The facts attending its execution are about these: Peter Praxel was the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kragnes v. KragnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Knoblauch v. FoglesongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- National Citizens Bank v. BowenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Shalleck v. MunzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Giltner v. QuirkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morrison v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Federal Savings & Trust Co. v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
- Tiedt v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Henry Simons Lumber Co. v. SchnobrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Citizens State Bank v. VohsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.