Legal Opinion

Henry Simons Lumber Co. v. Schnobrich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 1924No. 23,924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. There were findings for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

*117The court finds that between April 12, 1921, and November 3, 1921, the plaintiff furnished the defendant Martin Schnobrich, the owner, materials for a building at Klossner, in Nicollet county, amounting to the sum of $1,565.81. The plaintiff filed its claim for lien on January 20, 1922. The defendant claims that no material was furnished for this building within 90 days prior to that time and that the lien therefore fails.

In the beginning the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Paine & Nixon Co. v. DahlvickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Thompson-McDonald Lumber Co. v. MorawetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. John Paul Lumber Co. v. HormelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Villaume Box & Lumber Co. v. CondonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Mikolas v. Val Blatz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rochester's Suburban Lumber Company v. SlocumbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Moorhead Lumber Co. v. Remington Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Johnson Hardware Co. v. KempfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API