Legal Opinion

Kragnes v. Kragnes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1914No. Nos. 18,442 — (275)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action in the district court for Olay county by Olena Kragnes individually, and as administratrix of the estate of Andrew O. Kragnes, deceased, to recover $1,000 upon a promissory note. The substance of the answer is stated at the beginning of the opinion. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment upon the pleadings was granted, Nye, J. Erom the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Action by plaintiff, administratrix of the estate of Andrew O. Kragnes, deceásed, to recover upon a promissory note executed by defendant to decedent in his lifetime. Defendant’s answer admitted the making and delivering of the note and alleged, in defense, that *116defendant is a son of decedent, and that on February 6, 1904, decedent gave and advanced to him the amount of money for which the note was given, in anticipation of defendant’s share in his father’s estate, and the note was given at the request of decedent without other consideration and solely as a memorandum of such advancement and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Pomeroy v. PomeroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Marshall v. RenchCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1868
  4. Turpin v. TurpinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Shalleck v. MunzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mercil v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  2. Leach v. LeachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Stanton v. StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Kuhne v. GauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Bush v. BushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API