Knoblauch v. Foglesong
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the decision of the former appeal in this action, (37 Minn.. 320,) the action was tried in the district court for Hennepin county,, before Rea, J., and a jury, and a verdict was directed for plaintiff,, who appeals from an order granting a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Gilpillan, 0. J.
Action against the defendant Cross man as maker,. and the defendant Foglesong as indorser, of a promissory note made.by Crossman, payable to the order of Foglesong, and by the latter indorsed in blank. At the trial, Foglesong offered to prove an oral agreement, made at the time of the indorsement, between the indorser and indorsee, this plaintiff acting for the latter, that the indorsee would look for his pay to the security only given by the maker with the note, (to wit, a mortgage upon real estate,) and not trouble- or sue the indorser; the plaintiff stating that he wanted…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bruggerman v. HoerrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Farwell v. St. Paul Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Germania Bank of Minneapolis v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Merchants National Bank v. BryngelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Peterson v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.