Legal Opinion

In Interest of JS

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1998No. Civil 980097PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] J.S. appeals from an order of the district court authorizing continued treatment in the State Hospital for one year. We conclude the appeal was timely, and we also conclude the district court’s finding alternative treatment is not appropriate is not clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm.

*92I

[¶ 2] J.S. has been here several times. See In Interest of J.S., 545 N.W.2d 145 (N.D. 1996) (J.S. IV); In Interest of J.S., 530 N.W.2d 331 (N.D.1995) (J.S. Ill); In Interest of J.S., 528 N.W.2d 367 (N.D.1995) (J.S. II); In Interest of J.S., 499 N.W.2d 604 (N.D. 1993) (J.S. I). J.S.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lang v. Bank of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Interest of KJLNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pryatel v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Schaan v. Magic City Beverage Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Haider v. J.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Van Valkenburg v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API