In Interest of JS
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] J.S. appeals from an order of the district court authorizing continued treatment in the State Hospital for one year. We conclude the appeal was timely, and we also conclude the district court’s finding alternative treatment is not appropriate is not clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm.
*92I
[¶ 2] J.S. has been here several times. See In Interest of J.S., 545 N.W.2d 145 (N.D. 1996) (J.S. IV); In Interest of J.S., 530 N.W.2d 331 (N.D.1995) (J.S. Ill); In Interest of J.S., 528 N.W.2d 367 (N.D.1995) (J.S. II); In Interest of J.S., 499 N.W.2d 604 (N.D. 1993) (J.S. I). J.S.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lang v. Bank of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- In Interest of KJLNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In the Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Pryatel v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Schaan v. Magic City Beverage Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Haider v. J.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Van Valkenburg v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.